1M people have joined Bluesky in the last day

(bsky.app)

16 points | by davidbarker 7 hours ago

3 comments

  • satvikpendem 59 minutes ago
    When I joined it, just as when I joined Mastodon, most of what I saw was just anti-Twitter and anti-Musk content, which I didn't really care to read about, either for or against both of them. It might just be who I was following but the people I followed were similar in both Twitter and Bluesky / Mastodon, mostly indie hackers and other small time SaaS founders, and even these people started posting a lot of anti-Twitter stuff, more than even talking about their own products. On Twitter, the same types of people just...didn't give a shit about any of the drama and I actually learned a lot about product building from their threads.

    It seems like if you start a platform mostly as a reaction to another platform, you're gonna get the same sort of social media bubble, only of the opposite variety. That's why I still use Twitter currently, I just don't see the same issue that other people seem to have, and that's likely because I don't engage in politics or respond to trolls on there.

    • 3adawi 7 minutes ago
      it's starting to change now - definitely give it another spin in a week or so - a lot of organic non-musk/twitter content there now
  • ZeroGravitas 7 minutes ago
    I don't really do any twitter style social media but just from checking the occasional post I can tell it's taking off because angry right wing trolls have started appearing in the replies.

    I'm guessing the technical and social response to that (ignoring and blocking seems to be recommended, dunk-quoting their idiocy actively advised against) will determine the long term success as a useful site.

  • andrewstuart 1 hour ago
    Why would this be any better or worse than Twitter?

    Won’t it be the same with fewer but growing number of users?

    • rsynnott 7 minutes ago
      - No pay-for-attention model.

      - Third party clients available.

      - Blocklists and other more sophisticated custom moderation available.

      - Threads and profiles accessible to non-logged-in people (note that you can read the linked post and its replies without being logged in; on Twitter you at minimum couldn't see the replies, and depending on the account/phase of moon might just get an error for the actual post.)

      - Less deranged leadership (at least now that Dorsey has flounced off).

      - Blocking works.

    • yen223 32 minutes ago
      For a side project I created a new account on X and on Bluesky, both before the election.

      Bluesky asks what my interests are. I said software engineering, science and tech. Bluesky showed a lot of posts of cool space photos.

      X asks me to follow an account from a list. I chose NASA. Out of curiosity I checked out the "For you" tab on this brand new account. I did not get recommended space photos. X pushed a lot of political posts, some bordering on hate speech (one used the n-word).

      I don't quite know what explains the differences between the new-account experiences, but I had a much better time on Bluesky. I don't know if this will last, or if Bluesky is destined to follow in Twitter's footsteps once more people start joining, but I think right now Bluesky is in a good spot.

    • Arnt 1 hour ago
      It's oddly different. I think the reasons are subtle, but exist.

      I know one technical difference: if someone quote-tweets to dunk on you, you can stop it.

      There must be more like that, because the effect is readily noticeable.

      • wildpeaks 1 hour ago
        It doesn't stop the dunking because people will quickly adjust to use screenshots instead of detachable quote-tweets, but you're less likely to stumble on it, everyone remains in their bubble.