Okay, firstly you we use SEC and a few other datasets from Google and similar datasets. We filter them based on credibility. The research papers are pulled from a corpus called Semantic Scholar which is pretty high quality. We also do ArXiv and PubMed.
Thanks for proving our point for us. People will do whatever they want. Some of us are smart enough to check the truth, but most of us are not. There’s a need for fact checking and hopefully, people can come to a consensus on that.
Biased towards whatever the hell someone wants to portray. Truth is no longer displayed, what’s displayed is only what you want. HN is one of the better platforms and so you can tell. What about the others where bots dominate?
Edit: it's also immediately obvious the number of brand new accounts that are engaging in the comments here with generic comments.
* https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=ka2429
* https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=shrishti12
* https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=AddySmith2410
Is there are word to describe that behaviour?