Here’s the context: Claude Code currently offers a $200/month plan with very generous usage, including advanced features like Ultrathink, Opus, and (as of v1.0.71) background commands that let it run 24/7. I’ve been building real products on top of it, using these features exactly as intended. By leaning heavily on Claude Code (with some help from Cursor), I ended up being the top token consumer globally.
Some commenters on Reddit saw this as “abuse.” Personally, I don’t. Everything I did was within the rules Anthropic set. To me, it shows what’s possible when you treat Claude Code not just as a coding assistant, but as an actual development engine.
Here are the products I’ve built so far:
1.Raphael AI https://raphael.app – AI image generation with no login, no daily cap, and unlimited free usage. Paying users can unlock higher-fidelity models.
2.AnyVoice https://anyvoice.net – Ultra-fast voice cloning from a 3-second sample, producing voices that are nearly indistinguishable from the original.
3.Fast3D – https://fast3d.io A platform that turns text or images into 3D models in seconds, designed for speed and simplicity.
All three products are already profitable and sustaining a small company, and we have two more major launches planned before September.
The Reddit thread raised an interesting debate:
- Where is the line between “power use” and “abuse” when a SaaS product offers generous terms?
- Should companies celebrate heavy users who push their tools to the limit, or restrict them?
- And more broadly, what new kinds of businesses become possible when development itself can be automated at this scale?
I think you paid $200 a month and that is a very serious price point for a subscription. For that much I think it is fair to use as much capacity of a service within the terms of the agreement. If the company did not plan for power users then they are to blame. Maybe they will need to reconsider the terms of their plan.
I don't think you did anything wrong. You are paying them a lot and utilizing their service fully. Forget what reddit thinks mostly a bunch of kids giving advice on things they have no experience with.
Another comment from me, have been curious about voice cloning for a while just to troll some friends. Checked out your site. I have to say I was not overly impressed. You describe it as nearly indistinguishable from the original. Ya some of the samples you have are close but then they have serious issues with speech cadence. Like when saying AI they say A, then there is a pause then say I. It sounds very unnatural. It didn't do that pause with all samples however just some.
Next though some samples sounded pretty close listening to the MrBeast sample it sounded nothing like him at all. He has such a recognizable voice there is no way I would ever believe I was listening to him with that sample. I might try the free option with some of my friends voices and see what I think but for the paid price I would be hesitant.
Lastly who do you think is using this service and for what reason? This is a genuine question. I wanted to troll some friends with a voice clone but would not have such a need that I would want to do a monthly subscription maybe make a few audio recordings and joke around a bit. So I am curious what do you think the main use of your paid version is being used for? I have heard some scammers are now using cloned voices to trick people into scams do you think your service is being used for that?
No judgement just curious what you think and being honest with feedback on how I felt about your site. Cheers
Here’s the context: Claude Code currently offers a $200/month plan with very generous usage, including advanced features like Ultrathink, Opus, and (as of v1.0.71) background commands that let it run 24/7. I’ve been building real products on top of it, using these features exactly as intended. By leaning heavily on Claude Code (with some help from Cursor), I ended up being the top token consumer globally.
Some commenters on Reddit saw this as “abuse.” Personally, I don’t. Everything I did was within the rules Anthropic set. To me, it shows what’s possible when you treat Claude Code not just as a coding assistant, but as an actual development engine.
Here are the products I’ve built so far: 1.Raphael AI https://raphael.app – AI image generation with no login, no daily cap, and unlimited free usage. Paying users can unlock higher-fidelity models. 2.AnyVoice https://anyvoice.net – Ultra-fast voice cloning from a 3-second sample, producing voices that are nearly indistinguishable from the original. 3.Fast3D – https://fast3d.io A platform that turns text or images into 3D models in seconds, designed for speed and simplicity.
All three products are already profitable and sustaining a small company, and we have two more major launches planned before September.
The Reddit thread raised an interesting debate: - Where is the line between “power use” and “abuse” when a SaaS product offers generous terms? - Should companies celebrate heavy users who push their tools to the limit, or restrict them? - And more broadly, what new kinds of businesses become possible when development itself can be automated at this scale?
Curious to hear the HN community’s take.
Next though some samples sounded pretty close listening to the MrBeast sample it sounded nothing like him at all. He has such a recognizable voice there is no way I would ever believe I was listening to him with that sample. I might try the free option with some of my friends voices and see what I think but for the paid price I would be hesitant.
Lastly who do you think is using this service and for what reason? This is a genuine question. I wanted to troll some friends with a voice clone but would not have such a need that I would want to do a monthly subscription maybe make a few audio recordings and joke around a bit. So I am curious what do you think the main use of your paid version is being used for? I have heard some scammers are now using cloned voices to trick people into scams do you think your service is being used for that?
No judgement just curious what you think and being honest with feedback on how I felt about your site. Cheers