20 comments

  • Mashimo 1 hour ago
    > Tools For Humanity is actually partnering with Thirty Seconds to Mars on their 2027 European tour. While TFH has not disclosed the actual reason for the false Bruno Mars announcement, it looks a bit like a case of mistaken identity. Pretty ironic, since the company’s whole shtick is supposedly verifying human identities.

    :)

    • oersted 56 minutes ago
      Quite reminiscent of the "Four Seasons Total Landscaping" debacle :)
    • danesparza 6 minutes ago
      Actually, they are partnering with "The Martian" book tour. They're brining it back, baby!
    • semiquaver 1 hour ago
      How could this mixup possibly lead to the head of product announcing a Bruno Mars collaboration on stage???

      I’m trying to imagine the series of events that could lead to this happening and I’m coming up woefully short.

      • mattas 1 hour ago
        This really sounds like an AI voice agent transcribed "Thirty Seconds to Mars" to "30 seconds for Bruno Mars" and then no one actually proof-read the thing.
      • Mashimo 1 hour ago
        Probably like the children game "Broken Telephone" or "Gossip" where after a long chain of word of mouth input does no longer match output. Sprinkle communication between different companies on top of that.

        Thirty Seconds to Mars -> "The Mars band" -> ?? -> Bruno Mars

      • cowsandmilk 1 hour ago
        I routinely have to correct product managers repeatedly on key details of how their products work and how their customers operate so this doesn’t surprise me at all. It is totally a mistake I could see a product management director having been corrected on a dozen times but they keep making it.
        • RobRivera 2 minutes ago
          I have to ask you for coaching advice here, as I may or may not be experiencing similar things. Does the correction impact your political capital? I am a firm believer in critique in private, but in key meetings where capabilities are the inputs to other discussion, it is difficult to bite my tongue
      • konschubert 1 hour ago
        Four Seasons Total Landscaping.
      • alqpejfjfb 29 minutes ago
        It’s hard to spin it as a mixup when both acts were announced at the event.
      • sophacles 59 minutes ago
        It's a simple tale, one as old as time - the religious scammers started believing their lies and drank the kool-aid.
  • thevillagechief 55 minutes ago
    Lately I’m realizing what an absolute drain imposter syndrome is. I see things like this and I think maybe I could jump three levels up into a completely different department and be just fine, at least for a while. Then maybe fail up?
    • bee_rider 28 minutes ago
      You might not have the right core incompetence here. Like could you have honestly (from your point of view) reported that you had a Bruno Mars collaboration? You might have double checked.
    • ryandrake 32 minutes ago
      Most of us here could easily do the day-to-day work of the CEO of our companies. Somehow we have adopted this corporate mysticism that tells us that people with CxO or SVP in their titles are somehow smarter, more skilled, more qualified than the rank-and-file, but I don't think it's true. They eat and shit just like we do.
      • RaftPeople 23 minutes ago
        > Most of us here could easily do the day-to-day work of the CEO of our companies.

        I'm not so sure about that.

        When I do a thought exercise and put myself in our CEO's shoes, I think "ok, which decisions do I need to make today to keep the company thriving in the next 3 or 5 or 10 years?"

        For me personally, I don't really know. You can't just do the same thing because the economy is constantly evolving, but I can't see where it's going.

        • _alternator_ 14 minutes ago
          Here's the trick: the CEO doesn't know either, but they make decisions anyway. Knowing that they don't know is a good skill for a CEO to have, it freezing when they don't know is not.
        • buttercraft 4 minutes ago
          Nah, even if you fail miserably, you'll still get a nice payout and retire comfortably. Hell, you can even commit crimes and the company will pay the fines for you!
        • frakt0x90 17 minutes ago
          You would also have a whole team of consultants, advisors, lawyers, and VP+ people specializing in each area telling you what the problems and possibilities are if you actually had that job. They're not operating in a vaccuum.
        • InsideOutSanta 15 minutes ago
          The fact that you thought to consider the next 3, 5, or 10 years already makes you a better CEO than most CEOs that I personally know.
        • hacker161 15 minutes ago
          > For me personally, I don't really know. You can't just do the same thing because the economy is constantly evolving, but I can't see where it's going.

          Neither does your CEO

      • jacquesm 15 minutes ago
        You could, in good times. In bad times it is an entirely different story.
      • M3L0NM4N 29 minutes ago
        Experience is probably (at least should be) the differentiating factor.
        • Foobar8568 24 minutes ago
          Network and social status is more important than your experiences.

          And media loves outliers or bullshitting on the self made part.

    • jacquesm 15 minutes ago
      Only if you're comfortable with fraud.
    • sergiotapia 35 minutes ago
      History belongs to the people who show up.
      • gensym 21 minutes ago
        Unfortunately, right now, it seems like history belongs to the people who bullshit.
  • rvnx 3 minutes ago
    Something I don’t understand, how does that verify identity? Couldn’t a third-party person simply save the pictures taken by the Orb (especially by modifying the firmware)?
  • _verandaguy 1 hour ago
    An outstanding move for a company claiming to sell trust as a service.
    • 2ndorderthought 1 hour ago
      The issue I have with it is it's completely unsurprising. They just don't care and are testing the waters with the consequences or the lack thereof for these types of lies. It's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.
      • 3form 1 hour ago
        Reminds me of bunch of cases of high-profile people testing the waters of the low-quality Twitter posting.

        Turned out you can ride far not only despite it, but also thanks to it.

    • mentalgear 1 hour ago
      Sam Altman: the CEO of companies selling 'Intelligence' and 'Trust' (... me Bro) as a service.
    • abirch 1 hour ago
      Offtopic but you've triggered my rant

      What is frustrating to me is the IRS was scammed. They sent my refund to some identity thief. This from an institution that if I owed them 10 cents, they could track down all of my financial accounts but they decide to deposit in some rando's account.

      • 2ndorderthought 1 hour ago
        Sorry that happened to you, but these verifiers won't solve that problem. It's pretty easy to get a picture of someone's face and irises. Especially once a few more data bases inevitably leak so the government can get the data for free use.
        • jonhohle 27 minutes ago
          Maybe that’s not a good way to verify someone’s identity then…
        • ArmadilloGang 1 hour ago
          [dead]
          • jacquesm 1 hour ago
            Nothing you can't fix with some spray paint.
      • ectospheno 1 hour ago
        Owing tax each year instead of overpaying solves this problem. As long as it’s less than $1000 you won’t pay any interest or fees.
        • ralph84 1 hour ago
          That doesn't solve anything when the fraudster is filing a fake return. They are under no obligation to include all of your carefully chosen income and deductions that get you to $1000 owed.
          • dylan604 29 minutes ago
            What? In order to get a refund, that means you have to overpaid what you owe. It's pretty simple. If you are not putting in enough, the fraudster cannot get a refund as you still owe. Like, where is the break down? They would have to know how much you have paid, and then file so many deductions that it'd probably trigger an audit. If you file that many audits not with an account signing off of them, I could only imagine that would trigger an audit as well. Then again, the IRS has been beaten so badly that they barely have enough employees to function.
            • smallmancontrov 9 minutes ago
              Why would a scammer be discouraged by the possibility that the person they have chosen to steal from might get audited?
      • Mashimo 1 hour ago
        > They sent my refund to some identity thief.

        How does that currently work?

        In DK they just send it to your "nem konto", the same bank account that also gets your wages. More or less a sym link, so even if you move bank it will follow. Makes life easy.

        • nemomarx 48 minutes ago
          when you file your tax paperwork each year you have to tell them which bank account to send the refund to.

          if someone else can file for you they can put in whatever info they like, so.

          • ryandrake 26 minutes ago
            In a sane world, this would just be a case of fraud between the IRS and the fraudster, and the person whose information was used would have nothing to do with it. It's unfortunate that we have this need to call it "identity theft" in order to try to shift the responsibility to some unrelated third party.
      • hvb2 53 minutes ago
        I mean, the US is the country that doesn't want a national id.

        So instead the defacto ID is your SSN. This was never designed with that in mind, lacks all security mechanisms/checksums and all.

        And if you were born before a certain time, all digits except the last few were determined by where you were born. And those last digits are the ones they frequently ask for...

        This is all just choices guys.

  • steve1977 1 hour ago
    Hallucinated a partnership...
    • renegade-otter 52 minutes ago
      That may be true. If they use LLms to write up all of their internal documents, it may have just pulled a "partnership" out of thin air, and no one bothered to check. "I guess we have one!"

      Brought to you by - Looks Good To Me(tm).

  • throwatdem12311 1 hour ago
    lol a mixup with Jared Lego’s band “30 Seconds to Mars”

    > “You’re right, I got these two artists mixed up because of the name. I’m really sorry” — ChatGPT

    • prepend 21 minutes ago
      I wish it was Jared Lego’s band.
    • dylan604 27 minutes ago
      Damn, I guess I've always been confused. I didn't realize the toy building blocks company was called Letos.
    • benwad 24 minutes ago
      Seconds later:

      > OpenAI CEO's company announces partnership with The Mars Volta

  • therobots927 5 minutes ago
    And we trusted Sam Altman with the economy.

    Sheeeeesh

  • ghoulishly 40 minutes ago
    “OpenAI CEO's Identity Verification Company Announced Fake Bruno Mars Partnership” the english language is rapidly running out of brand new sentences.
  • hmokiguess 9 minutes ago
    Next up, correction post announces partnership with NASA and the Mars Rover!
  • danans 1 hour ago
    As funny as this is, there is a serious side. This is a case of an unintentional hallucination propagating and amplifying through human social and incentive structures. This is also how probably how religious miracle stories work.
  • Lionga 1 hour ago
    You are right to call that out. Do you want me to remove all the press releases over the internet of our fake partnership with Bruno Mars?
    • jacquesm 1 hour ago
      Perfect - I have removed all of them. Once again, I apologize I should have been more careful. I've also erased the database and the email server on the off chance that any trace of this remained there. And no need to worry about the backups, I got those too.

      I can modify the script to make this sort of thing easier to do in the future. The change is minor and it can be quite revealing. Would you like me to do that?

    • MagicMoonlight 52 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • allears 33 minutes ago
    Not a problem! Move fast and break things! Disruption, baby, disruption!
  • chaostheory 1 hour ago
    They didn’t get scammed. The CEO just didn’t know the difference between 30 seconds to Mars and Bruno Mars.
  • hansmayer 1 hour ago
    Is anyone even surprised at this point? Probably a long chain of AI-"summarised" emails flowing back and forth.
  • camillomiller 1 hour ago
    And that, ladies and gentlemen, is Sam Altman’s unfettered attention to quality and details. This one is up there with Palantir in the list of companies that I hope will soon fail miserably and painfully.
    • sumeno 1 hour ago
      Hopefully Sam follows in the tradition of other transformational tech figures, like Sam Bankman-Fried and Elizabeth Holmes
    • blitzar 1 hour ago
      Palantir are a lot of things, incompetent they are not.
      • tyre 1 hour ago
        People I’ve spoken to in DoD strongly disagree with you there.
        • jlarocco 21 minutes ago
          Perhaps. But they made $1.6 billion in net income in 2025, which, from a business perspective, makes them about $10.6 billion more competent than OpenAI.
        • amuradbegovic 1 hour ago
          What are their complaints?
      • jLaForest 16 minutes ago
        tell that to those Iranian school girls, oh wait you cant cause palantir is incompetent and those kids are dead
      • sjsdaiuasgdia 1 hour ago
        Yes, they're fascist. Or at least Alex Karp is.
  • Lionga 1 hour ago
    Scam Altman doing Scam Altman things
  • Fokamul 1 hour ago
    OpenAI should partner with Kanye West.

    Fitting partnership. They should call it Hitler Brotherhood, or something like that.

    Maybe even Thiel would join and others.

  • sigmoid10 1 hour ago
    TL;DR: Some random marketing writers confused Bruno Mars with Thirty Seconds to Mars (with whom they actually have a deal).

    Still hilarious given the company's mission, but the comments here make fun of the wrong technological aspect.

  • rvz 1 hour ago
    You all just got rage-baited here. One side of this story is not telling the truth.

    Don't fall for it.

    • gblargg 52 minutes ago
      And the article doesn't even say it was fake, just a likely error.
    • cryptonym 43 minutes ago
      rage-baited? I think it's pretty clear to everyone they did a mistake due to lexical proximity with their actual partnership.