Mitm proxy is very reliable and is reviewed by human properly. Looking into source code, this project is hot mess written by claude and isn't reviewed properly....
Clawchrome uses a mitm proxy like this for network capture of a browser. I had my agent test using network capture with playwright, then again with simple HAR style reconstruction of the mitm proxy capture. It was just as effective.
Check it out if you want to give your agent a real browser, no cdp. clawchrome.com
I can understand the motivation for CLI-based clients, but the browser built-in network inspector overlaps a lot.
There is more to Oproxy with traffic shaping but would it be enough to convince ? Spawning a Docker is easy today but it would be less friction with a normal app imho.
Check it out if you want to give your agent a real browser, no cdp. clawchrome.com
I have it running in docker with docker run --rm \ --name oproxy \ --ulimit nofile=65535:65535 \ -p 8080:8080 \ -p 1080:1080 \ -e OPROXY_BIND_HOST=0.0.0.0 \ -e OPROXY_MITM_ENABLED=true \ -v oproxy-certs:/app/certs \ -v oproxy-storage:/app/storage \ ghcr.io/sauravrao637/oproxy:latest
and I set the proxy to use it, and it appears to work, but I don't have a way to see what it is doing.
There is more to Oproxy with traffic shaping but would it be enough to convince ? Spawning a Docker is easy today but it would be less friction with a normal app imho.