One comment to that demo was: "You cant just end it like this! WHAT DO YOU HAVE BEHIND THE GODDAMN SCENE?!"
Reply was a URL with the exact timestamp to the BEHIND THE SCENES: https://www.youtube.com/live/HG0twQJ7aG4?t=16050. The comment following this reply "was expecting this to be typical reply section clickbait but it's actually legit! Thank you!"
Another comment 'Developer: "Hey check out this funny useless software I made."
Big Tech and Investors: genuinely considering'
If it can't run on the metal, is it really an OS that's "native"? Surely an "AI-native" OS runs the AI in ring zero? Is a dockerfile the same as an OS? Always?
These are serious questions, about what is surely not a serious project.
I think it's parody? That said all products made with heavy AI use are so inherently bad, and the buffoons so credulous behind their prompts, that it's difficult to suss out genuine efforts by unqualified people vs. people who know it's bad and are doing it to be funny/make that point.
It's kinda like trying to identify actual crypto projects headed by people who have no idea how anything outside cryptographic programming works, versus ones headed by people who know exactly how stupid it is and are just looking to cash a check.
Also the people who hype AI and the ones who backed crypto are basically the same exact circle of bag holders. They'll be out of AI as soon as the bubble pops. I think robotics is gonna be the next one.
To be fair abandoned projects have always been a feature of GitHub and the broader coding community, it’s just now it’s easier to finish the project before abandoning it entirely
This gives me that same feeling as 90s-00s Linux .... Sure, your gonna royal mess it all up at some point and have to reinstall (probably sooner than you think)....but look at all the fun stuff you can potentially do with it.
One comment to that demo was: "You cant just end it like this! WHAT DO YOU HAVE BEHIND THE GODDAMN SCENE?!"
Reply was a URL with the exact timestamp to the BEHIND THE SCENES: https://www.youtube.com/live/HG0twQJ7aG4?t=16050. The comment following this reply "was expecting this to be typical reply section clickbait but it's actually legit! Thank you!"
Another comment 'Developer: "Hey check out this funny useless software I made." Big Tech and Investors: genuinely considering'
These are serious questions, about what is surely not a serious project.
It's kinda like trying to identify actual crypto projects headed by people who have no idea how anything outside cryptographic programming works, versus ones headed by people who know exactly how stupid it is and are just looking to cash a check.
Also the people who hype AI and the ones who backed crypto are basically the same exact circle of bag holders. They'll be out of AI as soon as the bubble pops. I think robotics is gonna be the next one.
[1] https://vibeos.sh/favicon.ico
> "I will not run AI with access to my hardware!"
> Sure! That's why we have a Dockerized version
Is this serious? Have I missed the point of the satire?
[0] https://github.com/caffeinum/vibeOS/commit/53439912487534870...