Dismissing something because you think it’s AI is just a shortcut for not having to evaluate it. If the argument’s weak, say why — guessing the author isn’t analysis.
There is no obligation for others to evaluate the claims. The line quoted by the parent suggests that it was written by a mathematical crank. I doubt AI would make such an unecessary statement. This is not how serious mathematicians write.
AI?
> Capabilities of the Big Daddy Engine include: forcing spacetime to emerge generating matter from contradictions deriving constants of nature