4 comments

  • elromulous 1 hour ago
    (disclaimer: I haven't watched this yet)

    Mathematicians / folks knowledgeable on the subject - do you think Fermat had an error in his (lost) proof? Or that there exists a solution that perhaps is more straightforward than Wiles's?

    My understanding is that Wiles had to use a ton of math (and invent some new math?) that had not yet been invented in Fermat's time.

    • kadoban 1 hour ago
      Consensus is that there's no way he had a correct, general proof.

      My personal guess is he figured out later that his proof was broken or limited and never got around to fixing it.

      • applfanboysbgon 2 minutes ago
        The funny thing is that whether or not he had a proof, it was only definitively proved because he claimed he had a proof, so in a roundabout sense, he's still responsible for the theorem being proved. It's kind of crazy to think about your words carrying so much weight that somebody from hundreds of years in the future will dedicate (a significant portion of) their life to them.
      • odyssey7 40 minutes ago
        We haven’t yet reached the era in which we’re allowed to know about the technique. The simple, intuitive proof will become available to us when the time is right.
    • jerkstate 1 hour ago
      I don't know that much about math but I've read that one possibility is he had found a valid proof for n=4 and assumed that it generalized. Hopefully someone else who knows more about the subject chimes in!
  • BinRoo 3 days ago
    Aside: the AI summary of this attributes the wrong person. This is Andrew Wiles.
    • OJFord 1 hour ago
      Do you mean Atish Joygobin, for the background music?
    • kurthr 3 hours ago
      Who solved FLT.
  • alex1138 2 hours ago
    I've only skimmed it but Simon Singh's book on it seems reasonably accessible to non-experts

    One interesting thing of FLT is Wiles is on record as saying it opened the door (I think. This is from memory) to Langlands Program, a series of mathematical connections

    Harder problems of course exist, Riemann Hypothesis et al but FLT still took hundreds of years to solve

    • hingler36 2 hours ago
      I read Singh's book a few years ago, I really enjoyed it and left with a basic understanding of the underlying math
    • QuesnayJr 2 hours ago
      You remember correctly. His result is a special case of Langlands.
  • pseudohadamard 1 day ago
    Just to check, this video isn't NSFW is it?
    • convolutedsoup 2 hours ago
      This comment left me so bewildered that I wanted to create a hackernews account just to comment this.
      • esafak 1 hour ago
        It might be a joke in reference to the video's title, "I loved every minute of it, however hard it had been".
    • jackdoe 1 day ago
      depends, I would say it is not safe for work as it makes you question what are you doing there :)

      its phenomenology porn

    • ThrowawayTestr 3 hours ago
      YouTube generally doesn't allow that