So in Dutch one expression for "that makes no sense" is "dat slaat nergens op", which literally translates to "that doesn't hit (slap, beat) anything".
A ruder variation of that is "dat slaat als een … op een drumstel", or "that hits like a … on a drum set".
"Als een tang op een varken" is the common one for me as well. Runner up: "Als een lul op een stadsbus" (it makes as much sense as a dick against a city bus)
The title alone sounds like this would be interesting, but I'll never know if it is because it has a trackers popup listing thousands of "partners" and a load of "legitimate interest" boxes ticked by default. This is Daily Mail level stuff, immediate back button for me.
This website has a list of data vendors 200 pages long, and it forces you to uncheck each one if you don't consent. I decided to close the tab rather than deal with this illegal dark pattern.
there's an amazing video on youtube about how metal bar/gong instruments (like gamelans) have different overtones, and regular western intervals instead of being consonant (like with vibrating strings) are dissonant - even perfect 5ths - and a totally different set of intervals are consonant (slendro and pelog tunings are a bit different for this reason).
thinking about it, each drum here would have totally different ideal scales to the others.
I've read hundreds of papers in my mathematics career, and they – good and bad – almost always blend into eachother and turn into a diffuse fog in my memory, where they're identified by "that good one by Johnson-something-I-think.. no the 90s one I think".
There are very few exceptions. Kac's drum paper is one. It's so nicely written!
Selecting different materials would not change much. Call the frequencies \lambda_1, \lambda_2, \lambda_3...
You can prove that changing the material has no effect on the relative frequencies: \lambda_2 / \lambda_1, \lambda_3 / \lambda_1, etc. are completely independent of the material.
The shape is the determining factor; changing the materials (and hence the wave speed) just dilates the whole spectrum.
There's actually a "ring-out" slider and a "mallet" width slider under the drum already.
Ring out controls how fast the higher modes decay (basically stiff vs soft material), The mallet width controls how many modes a strike can even reach, since a real mallet can't drive the high frequency ones very hard.
No labeled presets like "wood" or "metal" though, just raw sliders. Would be a fun addition if someone wants to map a few physically sensible combos to buttons. PRs Welcome!
https://eigendrum.com/#s=__Ap66fz1em9-NXp7_6a6-0AJu1AAiTv6gK...
A ruder variation of that is "dat slaat als een … op een drumstel", or "that hits like a … on a drum set".
For some reason I felt like sharing this trivia.
If you find it interesting, a star on the GitHub repo helps a lot.
And don't forget to follow me on github, I build cool stuff!
It would be interesting if you could simulate and then print (or laser cut) your own instrument on demand.
It does for me. But I do use an ad blocker (Wipr 2).
Also you can draw your own drums! What! That's so cool
thinking about it, each drum here would have totally different ideal scales to the others.
this is cool.
There are very few exceptions. Kac's drum paper is one. It's so nicely written!
You can prove that changing the material has no effect on the relative frequencies: \lambda_2 / \lambda_1, \lambda_3 / \lambda_1, etc. are completely independent of the material.
The shape is the determining factor; changing the materials (and hence the wave speed) just dilates the whole spectrum.
Ring out controls how fast the higher modes decay (basically stiff vs soft material), The mallet width controls how many modes a strike can even reach, since a real mallet can't drive the high frequency ones very hard.
No labeled presets like "wood" or "metal" though, just raw sliders. Would be a fun addition if someone wants to map a few physically sensible combos to buttons. PRs Welcome!