OpenShot 4.0: Record, Edit, and Color Like Never Before

(openshot.org)

119 points | by metrofun 1 hour ago

8 comments

  • renegat0x0 0 minutes ago
    - ...but is the video encoding fast? - Does it often break while encoding?

    That was my experience some years ago and I decided I will skip a decade to see it all working.

  • zikani_03 1 hour ago
    Nice, looks like a great release. UI looks like it got a nice touch up and also cool to see that the project has AI powered object masking using onnx models: https://github.com/OpenShot/openshot-onnx.
  • localtoast2 38 minutes ago
    This is one of those occasions where a video would be appropriate.
  • Almondsetat 1 hour ago
    Since the announcement is, frustratingly, low on details, did they implement the usual hue vs hue, hue vs sat, etc. controls? I don't do much color grading but my line of work requires using multiple cameras, thus I enjoy using a color chart to match the video clips. With a vectorscope and with the color chart I could quickly do basically everthing I need with this software instead of relying in Resolve, if only it offered those controls
  • Schlagbohrer 1 hour ago
    Has anyone tried having a local agent (like Qwen) use this? I wonder how good the API is for programmatic / CLI usage.
    • drob518 33 minutes ago
      That was the first question that popped into my head as well. We’re now in the age of “AI all the things,” so it seems like every app needs an API or CLI of some sort. Everything needs to be machine accessible.
  • akrauss 1 hour ago
    Adtech cookie banner on a .org domain for a thing whose name starts with „Open“? No thanks. Won‘t look further.
    • TheChaplain 1 hour ago
      Your loss then. Although I prefer KDEnlive, OpenShot is not a bad video editor.

      And I don't think it's a terrible thing for an open source developer to try to earn a few coins.

    • bonoboTP 1 hour ago
      Its name starts with Open because it's open-source / free software (GNU GPLv3).
    • iLoveOncall 1 hour ago
      Oh come on, they only have 210 "partners" they give your data to!
      • magicalhippo 1 hour ago
        You jest, but with even trivial sites having 900+ so-called partners, "only" does indeed seem apt.
        • iLoveOncall 3 minutes ago
          I know, but we're talking about some free & open-source software funded by donations, not a for-profit company.

          Funnily enough their not (fully) free and not open source competitor DaVinci Resolve doesn't have a cookie banner and doesn't set any cookies on your browser.

        • LoganDark 58 minutes ago
          I feel like the only way to have this many "partners" as is to inherit them, at least if you're 'trivial'. Like, they probably chose some ad or tracking script that has so many partners.
  • jonathanstrange 45 minutes ago
    If it had VST support I could use it instead of DaVinci Resolve.
  • bewareofscams 1 hour ago
    How does this compare to After Effects, Premiere Pro, and Davinci Resolve?

    I am pretty sure, this thing solves half of the problems the above solve, and it does it half-good.

    • Matl 1 hour ago
      I am pretty sure you haven't tried it yourself. I am also pretty sure the software you mention is significantly more expensive or at least not open source.

      Which makes me pretty sure yours was a useless comment.

      • bewareofscams 1 hour ago
        I have tried the ones I have mentioned, and I hadn't tried this one, - which is precisely why I am asking!

        No need for snarky "but ours is foss smugface" comments.

        Not to say, your comment make me pretty sure you hadn't tried either of mentioned by me, and does not take video editing seriously.

        • Matl 55 minutes ago
          I use and pay for DaVinci Resolve Studio on Linux myself, so yes I have tried them and yes, they're obliviously more feature packed and polished than OpenShot is.

          OpenShot is however significantly easier to use and does what you need for casual editing. If you want a step above that and still FLOSS then Kdenlive is a better choice.

          What makes your original comment useless is that it reads like an American saying, 'I bet our GDP is bigger than Nauru's' - like what is the point? You know the answer already. An open source video editor is unlikely to be as good as DaVinci Resolve. DaVinci has multiplicity of the resources OpenShot/Kdenlive etc. do.

          So again, what is your point?

          • bewareofscams 47 minutes ago
            At least we can agree in our mutual disdain towards american way of thinking *shaking hands*
            • throwthrowuknow 25 minutes ago
              I can’t help but laugh at this, it’s like a comedy skit with two people with different European accents accusing each other of being American.
    • mschuetz 23 minutes ago
      I've had great experienced with it. It's almost certainly not as full-featered as premiere pro, but it runs buttery smooth and robust, while Premiere Pro kept crashing frequently and was a bit tedious to use for simple tasks.
    • t-writescode 8 minutes ago
      With enough time, love and leadership direction, any art-focused OSS can be the next Blender or Krita :)
    • bonoboTP 1 hour ago
      It's FLOSS (GPLv3). There are very few free software video editors. Another good one is kdenlive, which a few years back I liked better that OpenShot.
      • bewareofscams 1 hour ago
        This does not answer my question, I need something that can do thing, not how it is licensed. I have used Kdenlive, and it's nowhere near either of these functionality-wise, and struggles with big files.
        • bonoboTP 1 hour ago
          Unlikely to be near that polish and feature completeness. If you ask "then what's the point?", for now the answer is the license and the source availability.
          • bewareofscams 1 hour ago
            I've asked "how it compares", not "what's the point" -__-
            • t-writescode 6 minutes ago
              Honestly, it sounds like you’re going to end up asking a ton of very specific functionality questions that Da Vinci Resolve and co do in their own ways.

              Does OpenShot? For your specific use cases? I dunno, but it’s free, so give it half an hour or an hour and see? You’ll get more info than from many of us that probably don’t use this kind of software often.

              And then you can report back your findings! :D

            • GlacierFox 21 minutes ago
              You'll not get any sense from open source abdolutionists. Your question will not compute.