19 comments

  • anticorporate 46 minutes ago
    I moved all my custom domains to Fastmail five or six years ago and couldn't be happier.

    My Gmail only exists to catch legacy messages and Google service notifications. I look forward to the day I can completely migrate out of all their products, but some organizations I work with who use Google for various things have made that a slow slog.

    • dylan604 23 minutes ago
      I only use gmail for providing to services. I have a fastmail account that I use for stuff I want. I treat gmail as a PO Box and my fastmail as my private mailbox. It is rare that I actually need to read my gmail other than when services only offer 2FA via email. It makes a huge difference
    • matheusmoreira 23 minutes ago
      Me too. Moving mail to my own domain is one of the best things I've ever done.

      To anyone considering it: just do it. Doesn't matter what provider you pick, the important thing is to start receiving mail via your own domain as soon as humanly possible. Once mail is going to your own domain, switching is as easy as updating DNS MX records.

    • zatkin 22 minutes ago
      From a different angle, I moved from hosting my own e-mail server to having it all served in Fastmail, and I couldn't be happier as well!
    • baggachipz 41 minutes ago
      The moment they turn off automatic forwarding (and I have no doubt they will), my gmail address dies. I'm trying to migrate accounts over whenever possible, but it's quite tedious.
  • evolve2k 2 minutes ago
    The multiple nudges just turned into a shove.

    I’ll now be actively enacting plans to move on and be sure to support family and friends, even non tech savvy ones, to do the same.

    When you think they can’t fall further, they do.

  • happyopossum 21 minutes ago
    Current headline on HN is incorrect - it's not custom domains, it's third-party email addresses, such as @yahoo.com or @outlook.com. Domains and other gmail addresses you own can still be used....
    • striking 3 minutes ago
      Where does it say that domains you own can be used? I'm looking around and nothing clearly states it afaict.

      > This change does not affect Google Workspace aliases or other Gmail addresses you own.

      to me, implies that you need to set up Google Workspace for that domain before it'll work.

    • chrisss395 5 minutes ago
      I don't think folks read the source link. Most responses are a plug for Fastmail.
  • roesel 6 minutes ago
    As someone who uses their personal Gmail account to forward emails from custom domains to (via MXRoute and other email providers), losing the ability to "Send as" from the given adresses from Gmail means I will have to find an entirely new "home base" for email (and paradoxically start forwarding my peronal Gmail emails these instead?), right?

    Similarly to losing Inbox many years ago, this really sucks.

  • ericpauley 1 hour ago
    This was the last straw for me. I'm migrating to Apple Mail and cancelling workspace ASAP.

    ETA: I said nothing about where I'm planning to host my SMTP server. Apple Mail is a provider-agnostic client-side application, like Thunderbird.

    ETA2: Those who read TFA carefully will know that, even though this doesn't affect Workspace aliases, it does affect this feature (Send-As SMTP) for workspace accounts.

    • lrvick 1 hour ago
      So you got burned by a centralized proprietary mail service suddenly making user-hostile changes, and your first instinct is to move to another centralized proprietary mail service by a company with a long history of user hostile changes?

      Truly modern consumer sensibilities are fascinating to me.

      Personally I do not use any Apple or Google products. There are so many better choices!

      Anyway, might I suggest services that run standard open source mail daemons that never restrict you, like Migadu.

      • tclancy 48 minutes ago
        Not everyone is interested in how the sausage gets made. Most people buy a drill to make holes, not to disassemble to learn how to build their own drill. And yes, I have a Migadu account. But I front many of those email addresses via Gmail.
        • iamnothere 39 minutes ago
          Ignoring how the sausage is made is how people repeat the same mistakes, over and over, in domains as diverse as government, tech, employment, and automobiles.

          I get that not everyone has the bandwidth or capability to dig into things on their own, but we live in a hostile environment, and we have to either acknowledge that and plan for it, or touch the hot stove over and over again.

          • cj 8 minutes ago
            This is partly why I like to read HN comments. People here go above and beyond in ways I would never bother. Reading other's experiences saves me from going through it myself.

            There's no need to test mail services first hand. Just read up and do some rudimentary research.

      • carlosjobim 32 minutes ago
        Apple Mail is a client, not a host. It's an old school e-mail program on your computer, which you connect to whatever server your e-mail is. Whether that's your own domain, Gmail, iCloud, Hotmail or Yahoo or anything else.
      • tekla 53 minutes ago
        Poster didn't get burned.
    • Calinterman 1 hour ago
      Before you do that: Consider a more open and transparent email platform such as Proton, Fastmail, Runbox, Tuta, basically just reconsider moving from one evil, unaccountable platform to another. As you may find the evil, unaccountable platform may do evil and unaccountable things.
      • kstrauser 14 minutes ago
        I'll say this for Apple Mail (the email service, not the email client): it's dirt cheap and works really well. You can bring up to 5 self-owned domains to it on the $1/mo iCloud+ plan. That price includes 6 users, and up to 3 aliases ("hackernews@example.com") per person. Even when Proton isn't helping the FBI identify protesters[0], their family plan is $24/mo if you pay annually.

        I ran my own server for about 25 years. I put in my time and got tired of doing it. I've migrated my own email to Apple's servers mainly because it's the only reasonably priced family host I could find.

        [0] https://www.404media.co/proton-mail-helped-fbi-unmask-anonym...

    • throooooo 1 hour ago
      With workspace you can add your own custom domains anyway... This seems unrelated.
    • cptskippy 1 hour ago
      > This change does not affect Google Workspace aliases or other Gmail addresses you own.
  • nottorp 8 minutes ago
    Hmm I'm confused. I have my own domain that is totally not hosted on google. However, I use Google's SMTP to send mail as that domain (specifically the one email address that is enabled on my custom domain).

    For that I'm authenticating to the SMTP with my google account, and I somehow proved to google i own the email a couple billion years ago when we all had pet dinosaurs.

    Are they discontinuing that or something else?

  • occz 1 hour ago
    I have a domain and a contact email address for that domain that I have exclusively used through GMail, I guess this means I need to figure out a different path forward for that, then?
    • fhdkweig 51 minutes ago
      Since you planned ahead, it should be as simple as getting a new provider and updating the MX record. If you are looking for suggestions, I'm on Fastmail's $50/year plan and quite happy with it.

      https://www.fastmail.com/how-to/email-for-your-domain/

    • dietr1ch 1 hour ago
      Good thing they are reminding you to get out of Gmail for real
      • LetMeLogin 51 minutes ago
        It's not an easy task! I had mine account since gmail beta, so much stuff is going through it.

        Two years ago I moved to Fastmail(they're great), and pretty much setting up an alias per site/purpose. While I'm happy to see that gmail receives less & less, I still have about 150 entries in 1password that say @gmail.com... maybe one day...

        • dietr1ch 4 minutes ago
          I know! I got my own domain and it probably took me over a year to be confident that no important email was getting to me though my gmail handle I had been using since 2004
        • goobatrooba 34 minutes ago
          I switched to migadu which was not too painful for a single account (basically the advice was to put both accounts in thunderbird and then move everything over, thunderbird does the work). For email very happy with the provider, notably also as it allows infinite domains.

          But I miss a proper calendar which migadu is strangely mostly lacking (basic caldav only). Is fastmail better in this respect? And can you do wildcard emails and send/receive as whichever name you want with fastmail? E.g. I have it set so every email which comes to xyz@domain.com arrives in my single inbox (so not catchall but all with a certain letter combo) and use this to have custom emails for every site.

        • Evidlo 48 minutes ago
          Just do email forwarding and progressively update your accounts?
          • dietr1ch 2 minutes ago
            Yeah, I'd say it's this easy, but it just takes a very long time to get confidence on it being ready enough.
        • carlosjobim 34 minutes ago
          It's a very easy task. Move your stuff and accounts to a different provider in the pace you prefer, and set gmail to forward to the new provider. Keep your gmail account around as a haunted house for the occasional messages that can only come through that way.

          Compare it to somebody who eats fast food every day. They can start eating healthy instead, but it doesn't mean that they are never allowed to eat fast food again, or even once per week if so be.

  • Calinterman 1 hour ago
    This will probably grenade the plans for many small businesses, right now.
    • Fergusonb 1 hour ago
      Certainly seems intended to drive Workspace subscriptions, but I wonder how many of those users will sign up for Office instead.
    • HugoTea 1 hour ago
      This doesn't apply to Google Workspace addresses that most small businesses will be using.
      • Shank 55 minutes ago
        A lot of small businesses actually have a free address for legacy purposes. Send as, even for paid users, won’t support third-party providers.
      • ericpauley 31 minutes ago
        This is incorrect. The plan doesn't apply to workspace aliases, but it does apply to workspace users using Send-As via SMTP.
  • pgt 25 minutes ago
    This is suicide for Gmail.
    • mbreese 19 minutes ago
      Doubtful. It will reduce some user count, but most people won’t care. And they probably spend more supporting the feature than they gain from the Gmail users that actually use the feature.
  • wnevets 55 minutes ago
    > we occasionally have the difficult choice to discontinue features that require disproportionate maintenance resources.

    Am I really expected to believe that the billions of dollars the company makes in pure profit can't sustain this feature? Am I really expected to believe the touted productively gains granted by Google's AI can't sustain this feature?

    • anotherhue 48 minutes ago
      Anyone still using Google for anything other than ads and YouTube post Reader has only themselves to blame.

      Maybe GCP. It's like saying the tiger had no prior history of violence.

      • dude250711 39 minutes ago
        It is not possible to use Google for anything but ads, since otherwise you can only be a product for them hence be used by Google.

        Do not be used by Google.

    • ericpauley 33 minutes ago
      The flip side of this is that GMail's Send-As feature has seen virtually no maintenance whatsoever. It's buggy-as and I expect most people (like myself) have been putting up with it out of inertia because switching email clients is a pain.
    • staz 39 minutes ago
      Sodas are no longer free. *

      Seem Google don't feel the need to market to hackers and early adopters anoymore..

      * https://steveblank.com/2009/12/21/the-elves-leave-middle-ear...

    • crossroadsguy 40 minutes ago
      Keeping the good, bad, and evil aside for a moment, is it possible that the very reason this company makes billions consistently is because they ruthlessly (or stupidly as per "us") drop things they don't want to do, don't need to do, irrespective of whether we think those would have been profitable, or even very nice of them?
    • DarmokTanagra 26 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • bognition 33 minutes ago
    Honestly i'd love to migrate off of google, but its been a pain. My family is a heavy user of google calendar so I either have to migrate them off or I have to keep my google calendar account.

    I tried fastmail but honestly its not as easy to use as gmail.

    Has anyone pulled off a migration like this? how did you do it?

    • toast0 9 minutes ago
      My family uses google calendar but has never used gmail for day to day stuff.

      Maybe a problem if you send calendar invites, I guess?

      Obviously, can't close your account and still use their calendar, but whatcha gonna do.

  • solfox 57 minutes ago
    Calling it now: they will reverse this decision by December after they realize how many gmail customers they are losing.
  • ChrisArchitect 1 hour ago
    It's weird that they are actively discouraging us from using external mail inside gmail. Like, you would think they want us sucking down all our scannable data into their system and staying inside the wall.
    • ceejayoz 1 hour ago
      I'd imagine the adoption of DMARC, SPF, DKIM, etc. have just functionally killed the feature.
      • throooooo 1 hour ago
        Yes, that was my first thought. It's wild to me that GMail would support sending as yahoo.com, outlook.com, etc. in the first place. Google makes lots of questionable decisions and shuts down lots of products uncessarily, but this is not a strange or unwarranted move.
        • zootboy 51 minutes ago
          It's not wild at all. It's just behaving like any other MUA but with an extra step. You have to give GMail your SMTP submission credentials for the sending server of the target domain, then prove ownership of the specific address you want to send as. SPF/DKIM/DMARC works fine, as GMail is just submitting your message on your behalf the way any MUA would.
          • throooooo 44 minutes ago
            Oh, if they're sending via your provider's SMTP then that makes sense. Still, I can't imagine a lot of people use this feature.
            • jayturley 30 minutes ago
              We are a small web development company. I'd say that about 20% of our clients used this feature because gmail WAS their email client. They did't want to use a device-based mail client.

              I am happy we will no longer have to support this. Losing the POP access a couple years ago got about half of them to move, and this will kill it off.

    • treis 1 hour ago
      Looks like it's still allowed in app. Probably a way to cut down spam and push people to the app.
  • ChrisArchitect 44 minutes ago
    Related from Oct 2025:

    Gmail will no longer support checking emails from third-party accounts via POP

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45439670

  • petesergeant 52 minutes ago
    Moving to Fastmail was almost entirely painless, although you may end up with 1-2 pieces of spam a day.
    • tomasphan 23 minutes ago
      Fastmail comes up in every thread about email. Do you get a referral bonus or is the astroturfing team over there just that aggressive?

      I saw 5 mentions of it in this thread so far and no mention of any other provider.

      • nosioptar 3 minutes ago
        I've been searching for email provider that's not purelymail, fastmail really seems to be the best reputable option.

        (Looking to switch off purelymail because the new design blows and I'm really unsure about the new owner. Can't put my finger on it, but I just dont trust the guy.)

      • branon 6 minutes ago
        This is against site rules: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

        > Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email hn@ycombinator.com and we'll look at the data.

      • gr_norm 15 minutes ago
        > Do you get a referral bonus or is the astroturfing team over there just that aggressive?

        The far simpler explanation is that it's a solid product. Go ahead, check my comment history: I haven't mentioned it previously (as far as I remember, not gonna check all my comments to verify).

      • petesergeant 10 minutes ago
        [dead]
  • cptskippy 1 hour ago
    Further clarification here: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/17101213

    It seems like they're removing POP/IMAP support from the web client?

  • j45 40 minutes ago
    Brutal. How are other platforms solving this without disproportionate resources?
  • BuckRogers 38 minutes ago
    This doesn’t affect me, but it certainly influences me. I’ve been holding off from leaving Gmail for years. They try to force you into their Gmail app on iOS, it’s the only way to get push emails from them. OK fine. So I switch from Apple Mail to Gmail. I write a relatively long email full of research to send to my great uncle who is a professor at a nearby university who I greatly respect. I type it up on the desktop, go to the app, add another sentence wishing him well and send it. Come to find out since my phone is in dark mode it changed the text from black to white. That’s Google‘s idea of dark mode. So I have to send it again removing that text formatting and apologizing. Dark mode is something that Apple and Microsoft and everyone else can get right. It’s a presentation layer problem, not text formatting. And they don’t let you change the app to light mode, it only tracks the phone. Their web dark mode is also terrible. Apple and Microsoft have no such issues. Even smaller players like Proton get these things right. Maybe focus on delivering quality and value instead of trying to extract more out of your existing customers.

    Google is pathetic and has been for a long time for anyone paying attention to all their quirks, terrible UIs, and canceled products. I have a Gmail beta account from the earliest days. That 1GB was nice 23 years ago but it’s time for me to finally do the work and get off of Gmail. I have email accounts at most providers; Microsoft, Proton, Apple etc, and no one else has these sorts of issues.

  • YesThatTom2 54 minutes ago
    > This change does not affect Google Workspace aliases or other Gmail addresses you own.

    I bet most people complaining about this change don’t even know this feature exists.

    Right now you can forge email from any email address you can verify ownership.

    Most of those emails will end up in a spam folder.

    This doesn’t affect email addresses that Google controls DMARC records for.

    • john_strinlai 46 minutes ago
      >Right now you can forge email from any email address you can verify ownership.

      how can you "forge" something if you verify ownership? when you own something, it's not "forging" to use it.

      i think the point you're trying to get at is that the mail might fail dmarc requirements?

      • paxys 41 minutes ago
        Because ownership can change. I can still use Gmail to send email from my old university address that I lost access to 15+ years ago. This should not be possible.
        • john_strinlai 38 minutes ago
          if the mail from that address is being delivered to mailboxes, that's your universities fault.

          if it's not (i.e. spf & dkim is failing), that's just how email works and is not unique to gmail.

          • paxys 35 minutes ago
            Cool try explaining any of these terms to the average sysadmin.

            Email security is hopelessly broken, and the best you can do is try to limit exposure. Removing Gmail as an attack vector is one of those decisions.

            • icedchai 12 minutes ago
              Yep, SMTP itself doesn't have any security.

              Anyone else remember the open SMTP relays of the 90's?

            • john_strinlai 33 minutes ago
              >Cool try explaining any of these terms to the average sysadmin.

              if someone is managing a mail system and doesn't know what spf is, they should be immediately fired.

              i am also not convinced this will remove or limit exposure to anything. the attack vector lives in the protocol, not the service used.

              this might end up as a tiny, tiny blip in some small percentage of spammer/phisher operations.

    • PokeyCat 43 minutes ago
      Isn't this just using SMTP through whatever mail server you have connected to Gmail?

      Either way, this is likely going to stop me from using Gmail as my mail aggregator, I've used this feature for nearly a decade to send and receive from 6 different addresses, Gmail recognizes the to address and automatically sets the from address to the correct account.

      Is Thunderbird still decent nowadays? What's a decent mobile + desktop replacement?

    • tclancy 49 minutes ago
      > Right now you can forge email from any email address you can verify ownership

      I find this sentence confusing. Do you mean “forge” in a technical sense of “this email came from a server unassociated with the domain”? I don’t really get it. I’ve know this feature existed in Gmail for 15+ years and have made regular use of it. Plus I’ve used it to help older relatives keep an old address alive.

    • healsdata 43 minutes ago
      What an odd choice of inflammatory language for a feature that uses standard email headers. It doesn't forge anything since it clearly says it was sent from the GMail account on behalf of the other email address in the headers.